French Railway System - a case of going nowhere fast

As a quality professional I champion the value of customer satisfaction and listening to the voice of the customer… but is the customer always right?

Earlier in my career as a lab technician in the manufacturing sector I was trained to adopt the concept of the “Next operation as customer” (NOAC) principle that highlighted external customer satisfaction as being unachievable unless internal customers are engaged in the decision making and operational processes of productive activity.

The unfortunate scenario that emerged this year in France where the rail infrastructure company RFF provided the rail operator SNCF with incorrect specifications for the purchase of 2000 trains at a cost of $20 billion (£12.1 billion). The specifications were derived from measurements taken from train platforms built within the last 30 years. The result being the new trains are too wide to fit train platforms that were built 50 years earlier requiring  the unnecessary refit of over 1000 of the 8700 platforms mostly located in regional areas of which initial early repairs were reported to cost $40 million.

SNCF has accused the French government of not investing in its conventional rail network which is finally being upgraded after years of neglect. The strategic focus being rather on the development of a high speed network despite a 50% rise in passenger numbers within Paris and a 40% increase in regional travel within the past decade.

This separation of the network company from the rail operators, a management structure that is instantly recognisable to British readers is a contributing factor to the mistake – business critical decisions being made by social actors not directly affected or intimately concerned with the consequences or outcomes of the activity, as evident by the company statement "It's a bit like buying a Ferrari that you want to fit into your garage, but then realizing your garage isn't quite Ferrari-sized, because up until now you didn't own a Ferrari," an ill-fitting analogy that suggests quality and corporate social responsibility are for Renault owners, ordinary taxpayers and commuters.

In a nutshell decisions were not made as close to the source. Project schedules and cost may have been given priority over quality. Therefore the risk i.e. the likelihood or consequence of the train not being able to fit each platform was unaccounted or became unconsciously acceptable to senior management.  

The consequences of poor quality, an astronomical engineering refit cost which is estimated at $110 billion, 2000 trains going nowhere fast and reputational damage to one of Europe’s fastest train networks.
“The customer is always right”… 66 million Frenchmen can't be wrong - one size does not fit all even though your garage can fit a Ferrari.

To learn more about quality, safety and environmental management view our website www.sustainabilitycsr.com