Showing posts with label carbon footprint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label carbon footprint. Show all posts

Friday, 8 January 2021

American Society for Quality (ASQ) Sustainability Survey

ASQ Sustainability Survey

Scan the QR Code to benchmark your Sustainability & CSR performance against best practice within your industry 

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/ASQSustainabilitySurvey
 


#quality #sustainability #csr #climatechange #environment

Quality and Essesntial Element of Sustainable Development - American Society for Quality EED Summer Newsletter 2020




 

American Society for Quality EED Sutstainability Committee Strategic Plan - ASQ EED Summer Newsletter 2020

 










 

Sustainability Footprint: A Case of Persception in Two SMEs - American Society for Quality EED Summer Newsletter 2020

 









Wednesday, 30 May 2018

The Four Swans of Sustainability and more...



Learn more about sustainability in my easy to read, jargon free eBooks.
Get 2 eBooks for the price of 1 during European Sustainable Development Week 2018
With each eBook bundle receive a 75% discount on the online CPD accredited ©​Certificate in Sustainability Strategy  
Start your sustainability strategy journey by clicking the link below:


https://bit.ly/2LB0DNw

10 Sustainability Megaforces (10MF) Guides


Celebrate European Sustainable Development Week by future proofing your business using the SMART actions outlined in each 10MF guide.


The 10MF toolbox can be used as posters in your sustainability or CSR awareness campaign posters, on social media posts or as flashcards team building strategy sessions.
Download your toolbox by clicking the link below:

#sustainability #csr #quality #ESDW #environment #sustainabilitystrategy

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

Tuesday, 8 May 2018

Management Systems and Performance Frameworks for Sustainability

My second book Management Systems and Performance Frameworks for Sustainability: A Road Map for Sustainably Managed Enterprises is now available! A through an in-depth exploration of quality management theory, this book proposes a "Sustainability Management Framework" as a structure for a balanced approach to developing operations strategy for corporate social sustainability (CSR). #SustainableStrategy This book is a development in sustainable theory showing you a road map of how to put it into practice. #FutureProof Receive your complimentary copy as part of your ©Diploma in Sustainability Strategy comment below to know more. http://ow.ly/icHT30jN5RK

Thursday, 24 September 2015

Volkswagen quality - lots of smoke and mirrors?

Organisations and individuals strive for telos or purpose for their existence. This manifests itself in the business context in terms of values, mission statements and policy. The tragedy for Volkswagen is that its foundations was based on nefarious purpose that cannot be divorced from its present context.

Volkswagen was established by the Deutsche Arbeitsfront "German Labour Front" or DAF by the Nazi Party as part of its Kraft durch Freude "Strength through Joy" as free trade unions were banned under Hitler's leadership. The strength through joy program was meant to appease workers by providing affordable cruises, holidays, an affordable automobile and social activities once the domain
of the upper classes.

Along with Schönheit der Arbeit "Beauty of Work" the improvement of factories and work spaces the emphasis being "somke free" environments. Volkswagen "Peoples car" and its iconic "beetle" design was produced in 1938 with the intention to provide German workers with an affordable automobile at the price of a German motorcycle through a payment plan. Many German workers opted for this payment approach with the onset of war some prospective car owners lost their deposits. This led to protest regarding the leadership of the DAF under Dr Robert Ley who boasted that he controlled workers' lives from the 'cradle to the grave'. Subsequent Volkswagen automobiles for both domestic and military use prior to 1945 were made by an estimated 15000 slave labour victims from concentration camps comprising 80% of the company's wartime workforce. Volkswagen in 1998 accepted corporate responsibility for their actions and has set up a fund to compensate victims.

In its post-war reincarnation Volkswagen develop a renewed purpose as the car "Das Auto" built around a fun, friendly image of the "Beetle" shape embellished with the pictures of flowers and bright colours as well as popularised in Disney movies such as "Herbie goes bananas" along way from the militarised look of the original models. The whimsical nature of the "Herbie" film genre had a lasting impression on my childhood as one of my elementary school teachers owned a Volkswagen which some of my classmates described as a "dustbin on wheels". This analogy was not unfounded when compared with Japanese brands such as Datsun not only provided economy but were quieter due to the use of coolant rather than air to reduce engine temperature. The company continued its focus on volume rather than quality as its strategy for success. Consecutive Volkswagen executives have pursued this expansion acquiring 18% market share in China, 22% in Brazilian market coupled with a ruthless search for cost savings through component sharing between production models. The effects of this strategy is evident in Volkswagen's wind noise issue in 2011 and prior power train non conformity although a decade old contributing to a crisis in reliability has not been forgotten by consumers in key markets such as the U.S. where sales fell by 22% in summer 2014. J.D. Power Initial Quality Study has consistently rated Volkswagen brand near the bottom for every year except 2009.

The engineered rigging of emissions test and data arguably is symptomatic of an organisational culture with a misaligned purpose on "the car" rather than the customer/stakeholder i.e. global society. As a result over 1M tons of pollution in the form of emissions to air e.g. nitrogen dioxide (NO2)  from approximately 11M vehicles containing rigged components which is equivalent to the combined emissions from all power stations, vehicles, industry and agriculture. Pollutants such as nitrogen oxide (NO) and specifically NO2 pose a  respiratory threat to humans and animals by inflaming the breathing passages. The EU is disproportionately at risk due to the higher level of diesel vehicles when compared to the US where 3% of automobiles use diesel.

Volkswagen quality ethos is focused on "reliability, visual appeal and service" with  the absence of sustainability.
Sustainability can be achieved by cultural acceptance within the organisation that it has a duty to global society due to the lifecycle impacts of its products and services. Sustainability Footprints which is defined as "methodologies for assessing the social and environmental impact of the economic investment in a specific strategic option in relation to other strategic alternatives and their potential risk to the survival of future generations" e.g. carbon footprint can assist Volkswagen in monitoring and measuring its business performance leading to culture of innovation instead of deception.

Volkswagen by adopting a sustainable business practices can finally transform the company from being Das Auto "the car" but rather truly being the "People's car" putting individuals and society at the core of its corporate strategy and adopting a "cradle to the cradle" approach to managing its processes.

Monday, 10 August 2015

IEMA Approved Certificate in Sustainability Strategy

This course gives candidates a practical insight into the application of sustainability practices to business.
Climate change, energy and fuel consumption, the scarcity of water and material resources, population growth, wealth, urbanization, food security, the decline of the eco system and deforestation - the emergence of these sustainability mega forces within the 21st century business context have created both risks and opportunities for businesses.

The IEMA Approved Certificate in Sustainability Strategy will provide the knowledge and skills necessary to assist managers with designing strategies that will mitigate the effects of sustainability risks and enhance organisational potential to exploit opportunities.
You will study the development of effective business plans that incorporate sustainable development goals using the Sustainable Strategic Model Analysis Tool.
Subjects include:
  • Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility – Context and Definition
  • Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Dilemma
  • Sustainable Strategic Growth Model - a solution to the Sustainability and CSR dilemma
  • Sustainability Footprints – tools for growth
  • The Politics of Sustainability
  • Case studies
This qualification would benefit senior management, company directors, Quality Managers, Safety Managers, Environmental Managers, CSR/Sustainability Managers, Marketing and early career professionals who are involved in Sustainability/CSR implementation and reporting. 
The approach used in the course assumes no prior awareness by providing the knowledge and strategic tools to deploy sustainable development utilising best practice case studies.
For further information on our upcoming course dates and online program view our website www.sustainabilitycsr.com 

Thursday, 26 April 2012

The four swans of sustainability

 
On a recent visit to Edinburgh Napier Business School for a meeting with Dr. Ian Smith the sustainability program course leader. I noticed four origami swans on his desk. Upon enquiring further he intimated that the items were found at the end of one of his lectures on the seat vacated by an anonymous student.  Jokingly he suggested it is symbolic of the quality of his lecture which one of his students found origami more interesting!
But why swans?
Swans in mythology have helped Greek gods move across the sky and is considered by many ancient and indigenous peoples to symbolise transformation, balance and elegance. Swans depending on colour e.g. black swans symbolise mystery or uncertainty.
My own research into the phenomenon of sustainbility footprints (i.e. the use of carbon footprint, water footprint, ecological footprint and the emerging concept of social footprints to evaluate the present non-financial consequences and future risk implications of strategic decisions) - indicates Sustainability footprint methodology is at the nexus of three management theories:




·         Risk – sustainability footprint risk must incorporate environmental impact and its effect on cost structure and revenue streams

·         Natural Resource Based View – sustainability footprint measurement contributes to strategy through pollution prevention, product stewardship and sustainable development

·         Shared Value – as indicators sustainability footprint assists firms in the mitigation of environmental impacts arising from value chain activities

These theories reveal four key areas within which sustainability footprints can contribute to the success of the firm in terms of cost dimension, innovation dimension, environmental dimension and stakeholder dimension...... the four swans of sustainability
Results of our pilot case study suggest that sustainability footprints can transform stakeholder perceptions of waste from being a cost centre to a profit centre, reduce carbon emissions by diverting waste from landfill and stimulate innovation through the search for potential energy savings.
Firms that do not measure their carbon, social and water footprint expose themselves to uncertainty and risk especially within the context of climate change as they fail to adopt behaviours or make decisions which are expressly sustainable.

To learn more about quality, safety and environmental management visit www.sustainabilitycsr.com




Sunday, 4 September 2011

Scotland - A future with Zero Waste?

The bin bugs can only be attached to wheelie b...Image via Wikipedia

Scotland’s devolved government launched an ambitious Zero Waste Plan on 9 June 2010. The Zero Waste Plan aims to achieve waste recycling rates of 70 per cent with 5 per cent of waste going to a municipal landfill by 2025.


The UK has been considered as one of the laggards within the European Union, in terms of its efforts to promote waste recycling. Only two other EU member states – Greece and Portugal – have a worse track record when it comes to recycling waste. In the long term, this exposes Great Britain to the threats of landfill fines imposed by the European Union. In parallel with this, the export of UK waste to China for recycling also reduces opportunities for developing UK-based competency in recycling.
Within this context, the challenge for Scotland appears daunting. Its own track record over the past decade shows that 92 per cent of municipal waste was transferred to landfill during the period 2001/2002, reducing only to 63 per cent in 2008/2009. With a relatively small population size of 5.19m, the Scottish economy generated 20m tonnes of waste in 2008, of which 8.6m tonnes were attributable to construction sector activity. The rest of the commercial sector accounted for 7.6m tonnes of waste, with household consumption contributing 2.9m tonnes of waste.
This situation is exacerbated by the closure of landfill sites on the Shetland Islands and the Hebrides, whose  municipal waste is now pre-treated and used to generate Energy from Waste (EfW) as part of their district heating scheme.


Zero Waste Plan
Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan is influenced by three main drivers:
•The European Union Waste Directive 2008/98/EC. This European wide policy instrument is aimed at developing a “recycling society” within the European Union, whereby waste prevention, recycling and waste recovery options are explored for their environmental and economic feasibility. Landfill disposal is the least preferred option.

•The Climate Change Act (Scotland) 2009. This is an innovative legal instrument binding the Scottish Government to an 80 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, with an interim target of a 42 per cent reduction by 2020. Specifically, Part 5 of the Act requires the Scottish Government to initiate programmes to improve waste reduction. Waste in landfill sites releases hazardous methane gas, contributing to overall greenhouse gas emissions. The Scottish government is keen to apply carbon measurement techniques to help reduce the impact of waste on climate change, in addition to using traditional weight measures which are used to analyse its waste management performance.

•The Courtauld commitment. This is an agreement between government and the retail sector established in 2005 to reduce packaging, increase packaging recyclable content and improve packaging design by participants in the UK retail sector supply chain.

The philosophy behind Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan is rooted in the six steps of the Waste Hierarchy Model proposed in the EU’s Waste Directive (as seen in the box on the previous page).

Articulated in the Zero Waste Plan are initiatives to translate the broad philosophical approach of the Waste Hierarchy model into practical measures which are illustrated in the box below.


To implement its Zero Waste Plan, the Scottish Government is turning to the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) and the recently rebranded Zero Waste Scotland (formerly WRAP Scotland). The Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) also provided support to develop Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan. The latter’s role is now in doubt, however, as it has fallen victim to UK government fiscal austerity measures. In the absence of the Commission, it is envisaged that the Scottish Parliament and Audit Scotland will monitor the success of the Zero Waste Plan and the overall development of a sustainable economy in Scotland, although the effectiveness of this proposed arrangement is yet to be demonstrated.
Critical to the success of the Zero Waste Plan is the development of infrastructure to segregate and reduce the contamination of recyclable materials, such as contamination from food waste. This issue can be resolved through an increase in the composting of food waste, and consumer awareness campaigns encouraging individuals to see food waste as an importance resource. According to the Plan, waste materials could contribute 31 per cent of Scotland’s renewable heat target and 4.3 per cent of its renewable electricity target; but in order to make this happen, a shift in public attitudes is vital. Rather than waste being perceived as a liability, or an unavoidable consequence of consumption, it must be seen as an asset.
Waste management infrastructure developments such as aerobic and anaerobic composting sites, Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) facilities and Energy from Waste (EfW) schemes require a high level of capital investment, but they can contribute to long term economic growth and job creation. Initial projections indicate Scotland needs investment in waste management infrastructure of £1,046m above current levels, over the next 15 years, if it is to meet EU and Scottish Government waste reduction targets. A possible revenue option could be the redirection of costs incurred from the collection and disposal of waste, amounting to £404m during the period 2007 -2008. The onus is on businesses and households to help achieve this by reducing their own waste.
Improving the awareness of waste as a revenue source and its impact on the environment and human health has been a key programme of Zero Waste Scotland – the body mandated to implement the Scottish Zero Waste Plan. Through its partnerships with local councils and SEPA, Zero Waste Scotland has provided workshops, seminars, as well as consultancy support to encourage both individuals to change their attitudes to waste, and organisations to implement environmental management systems.
A recent waste awareness initiative conducted by Zero Waste Scotland showed the financial cost of cleaning litter on Scottish highways amounts to £100m annually, besides its environmental impact on the Scottish landscape and safety risk implications for litter collectors.

Legal framework
Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan provides business and society with a sustainable approach to development, but an intellectual appeal may not be enough. The Scottish Parliament is also backing up the programme through statutory instruments. The cornerstones of this future legal framework of waste management are found in the following proposed regulations:

Zero Waste Scotland Regulations 2011
Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) (Scotland) Regulations 2011.
•The introduction of the above regulations also necessitates amendments to the existing regulations, including:

•Environmental Protection Act 1990

•Waste Management Licensing Regulations 1994

•Pollution Prevention and Control (Scotland) Regulations 2000

•Landfill (Scotland) Regulations 2003

•Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations 1999.

•The Zero Waste Scotland Regulations 2011 will enshrine in law five key zero waste management goals:

•A landfill ban on key recyclable materials

•Bans on mixing separately collected recyclable materials

•The segregation, separation and collection of key recyclable materials

•Restrictions on the inputs to energy from waste processes

•A property-based ban on waste disposal of organic content to landfill.

Scotland has chosen to develop its Zero Waste Plan as part of a wider low carbon strategy for economic growth. However, if it is to achieve these waste management targets, and reap the rewards of both economic growth and job creation, it requires investment to upgrade its existing waste management infrastructure in an age of fiscal austerity. And that is only half of the battle: Scotland’s real challenge is to create a “Zero waste society” in which all its stakeholders participate in making “Scotland plc” a sustainable entity through the efficient use of resources.
Vital to the success of the Zero Waste Plan are the proposed Zero Waste Regulations which will provide a legal framework driving the implementation of sustainable approaches to waste management. The recent enactment of the Waste Information (Scotland) Regulations 2010 provides a clear indication of the intention of Scotland’s lawmakers to require the business sector to embrace sustainability. Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan was rolled out with little fanfare or hype, but its potential consequences for the way Scottish businesses currently operate are yet to be understood by Scottish CEOs and business leaders.
Six steps to “Zero Waste” Prevention

This is the cornerstone of Scotland’s approach to Zero Waste. Prevention includes any steps taken before a substance or material becomes waste, such as reducing the quantity of waste, product life span extensions, improved packaging and environmental and safety impact mitigation.

Re-use
This is the process of using products again for the same purposes for which they were initially designed.

Preparing for re-use
The cleaning and treatment of waste so that it can be re-used without further processing.


Recycling
Converting waste materials into products or substances for commercial or industrial use.



Recovery
Use of waste material as a substitute for other primary resources e.g. energy from waste schemes.



Disposal
Processing options which do not include the recovery of waste materials.



Waste Hierarchy Model, from the European Union Waste Directive 2008/98/EC
Waste hierarchy model

Prevention


• Implementation of Clean Technology, Eco-design and Best Available Techniques (BAT)

• Development of pertinent indicators, promotion of ISO 14001 and waste awareness programmes


Re-use
• Improve product durability

•Encourage the use of non disposable product alternatives


Preparing for reuse
•Development of reuse and repair networks


Recycling

•Implementation of carbon metrics and optimising the collection of recyclate (material that is capable of being recycled)

• Mandatory sorting of waste by commercial and industrial organisations



Recovery
• Institution of landfill bans for unsorted waste and restrictions on waste that is incinerated

• 25 per cent cap on local authority waste used for waste to energy schemes



Disposal

•Landfill reduction targets

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 9 January 2011

Enviropig and other GM food superheroes coming to a store near you

By Richard Wheeler (Zephyris) 2007. Lambda rep...Image via Wikipedia
If it smells like a pig, looks like a pig, sounds like a pig, eats like a pig then its a pig... rings true in all cases except in the case of Enviropig. Enviropig is a leap in biotechnology which combines an enzyme genome found in the bacterium E. Coli and mouse DNA to produce an altered pig that can digest phosphorus which is contained in the corn, barley and cereals that comprise its diet. "Ordinary" pigs cannot digest phosphorus therefore high levels of phosphorus is found in pig waste which at the industrial levels at which pigs are farmed increases the risk of phosphorus entering the rivers, lakes and watercourses. Phosphorus entering into inland fresh watercourses stimulates the growth of algae which depletes the oxygen in water killing fish and other aquatic life.
The phenomena of aquatic dead zones has resulted in stringent environmental regulation being applied to pig farming with the US adopting a "zero discharge" policy allowing no nitrogen or phosphorus run off from farming operations. Farmers attempts comply with environmental regulation by introducing phytase as a dietary supplement to reduce the phosphorus content in pig excrement in conjunction with the containment and treatment of pig waste has contributed little benefit for the level of investment accrued, making the development of Enviropig a welcomed breath of fresh air.
Our planet's population currently stands at 7 billion inhabitants depending on your religious persuasion or vegetarian dietary preference that leaves just over 6 billion human beings that would include pork, ham and bacon in their diet. Therefore Enviropig can contribute to the mitigation of environmental impact, however is it necessary to farm pigs at our current industrial levels? or should we adopt a balanced diet that includes mainly vegetables, fruit and other plant food as it will help save our planet and is good for our health?
If Enviropig is to become the pig of the future will "ordinary" pigs be relegated to zoos or altogether eliminated by an industrial breeding program? Are we entering into a much larger Orwellian phase of human existence where "All pigs are equal but Enviropig is more equal than others". Can Enviropig fly?
Enhanced by Zemanta